The Software Adoption Chasm: What's Really Stopping Business Owners From Modernizing
- Lisa Marshall
- 1 day ago
- 3 min read

Reading Geoffrey Moore’s ‘Crossing the Chasm’ changed how I think about this entirely. It's not about technology, it's about trust. That's the chasm.
The core model
Moore adapts the classic technology adoption lifecycle into five groups of customers:
Innovators — tech enthusiasts who'll try almost anything new, just because it's new
Early Adopters — visionaries who buy based on potential and competitive advantage, not proven results
Early Majority — pragmatists who want to see proof it works before committing
Late Majority — conservatives who adopt only once something is standard practice
Laggards — skeptics who adopt last, if at all
The idea that new tools and ideas don't move smoothly from early adopters to everyone else. There's a gap in between. Most products, and most good advice, die trying to cross it.
Here's what I've noticed sitting with business owners on both sides of that gap: when someone resists modernizing their bookkeeping or admin, it's rarely because they don't understand the benefits. They usually do. What's missing is trust that the change will go smoothly, and a sense that the risk of changing is lower than the risk of staying put.
I've seen this in small, human ways:
→ The business owner who insists on writing every cheque themselves, not because they don't trust technology, but because it gives them a feeling of control that real-time dashboards haven't earned yet in their mind.
→ The client who's stayed with the same bookkeeper for twenty years, on the same outdated system, because the relationship is the safe part, even if the tools aren't.
→ The contractor who knows, intellectually, that cloud tools would help, but trusts what's familiar more than what's theoretically better.
This is where I think a lot of us in this industry get the chasm wrong. The instinct is to throw more value at a hesitant client, more features, more ROI math, longer pitches. But if the real barrier is trust, more value doesn't close the gap. It just makes the pitch longer.
What actually closes it: → Proof, not promises → Small, reversible first steps (this is exactly why I like how QuickBooks Online lets a business start small, move the books intot he cloud, add automation later, rather than forcing a full overhaul on day one) → Translating the "why" into outcomes they actually care about → Patience with the timeline
There's also a simpler barrier that gets overlooked: a lot of business owners simply don't know what's actually available to them. They picture "QuickBooks Online" as one generic thing, without realizing there are different versions built for different needs, including more advanced functionality specifically suited to industries like construction. You can't get excited about crossing the chasm toward something you don't know exists.
But the chasm isn't only something between an advisor and a hesitant client, it shows up inside a growing business too, between the systems you have today and the ones you'll actually need tomorrow.
Here's the part that makes this harder over time: the busier a business gets, the less room there feels like there is to pause and fix anything. When you're slow, trying something new feels manageable. When you're genuinely busy, more jobs, more clients, more staff, stopping to implement something new feels like a luxury you can't afford. Ironically, that's exactly when the old systems start cracking the most.
That's why laying the right foundation before you scale matters so much, and why it's worth periodically turning inward as you grow to make sure your systems still fit your size, because the foundation you build today is what makes scaling tomorrow feel like growth, not chaos.
I see this playing out at a market level too, comparing what I observe in the UK versus Canada, but that's a longer story for another post.
For now, the takeaway I keep coming back to: if you're asking someone to change how they work, the real job isn't convincing them the new thing is better. Most of them already suspect that. The real job is reducing how risky it feels to take the first step.



Comments